A NOTE FROM LOUISE PENNY:
Welcome to the first meeting of the Three Pines Book Club—gathering in this virtual location of Myrna’s New and Used Bookshop.
Our first book to re-read is Still Life. I suspect most of you have already read it, but I also think some of you might be new to the series.
The novels are set, for the most part, in the fictional Quebec village of Three Pines.
I created the village as a place of refuge. A place I would choose to live. That was beautiful, and peaceful. That offered company, companionship—as well as croissants and rich café au lait. And licorice pipes.
I was much taken, years ago, when reading Virginia Woolf’s Orlando. Orlando, the main character, had lived many lifetimes in many guises. Now, I’m paraphrasing the opening of that book, but Woolf wrote something to the effect that over the years, in each of those lifetimes, Orlando was looking for only one thing. It wasn’t riches. It wasn’t power. It wasn’t even love.
What Orlando yearned for was company.
I’d been through periods in my life when I thought I would die from loneliness. And so the idea of belonging, of company, of home, was powerful.
The world, when I started writing Still Life, was suddenly a pretty scary place. 9/11 had happened the year before and more attacks seemed imminent and would almost certainly be completely unexpected. Suddenly places and activities that had seemed benign, safe, fun, were riddled with insecurity.
I wanted to pull the sheets up over my head, stay in bed, and read.
But, like you, I couldn’t. But what I could do was create that safe place.
Oddly, perhaps, I also chose to violate it—by bringing murder into the pretty little village, and into the lives of Clara, Peter, Ruth et al.
But it also brought Chief Inspector Gamache. The decent man, who made a living investigating the indecent act of homicide.
Just as I created a community I would live in in Three Pines, and villagers I would choose as friends in Clara and Myrna and Gabri etc—I also intentionally created, in Armand, a man I would marry. Because, in many ways, I knew if Still Life spawned a series it would become like a marriage. And he needed to have the qualities I admire in a man. In anyone. The qualities I strive for, and so often fall short of, myself.
But peace untested might prove an illusion. And so Three Pines is tested when Miss Jane Neal is murdered.
And goodness might be shallow, situational. And so Gamache is given Agent Nichol to test him and, more insidious, the Arnot case. To see if he really is a decent man, or just pretending to be when things are going his way. The first reference to Arnot is in Still Life—it clearly refers to something horrific, but unexplained, in Gamache’s past. And in the recent history of the Sûreté du Quebec.
This was intentional. It was important that it be clear that all these characters have pasts, and we are coming in mid-life, mid-leap. But, as with new friends, all will eventually be revealed.
Here now, in Still Life, we are introduced to Gabri and Olivier, to Ruth, the demented old poet. To Clara, who creates art from her heart, and Peter, the more successful artist in their marriage. To Ben, who never strays far from home, and Myrna, who found a home in Three Pines. And all the other villagers whose lives mix and join together. From here their stories move forward, but we also see further and further back. To what made them who they are.
These books are murder mysteries, but they’re not about murder. They’re about love and belonging, about loyalty and choices. And the courage to be good.
INTRODUCTION BY LESA HOLSTINE:
I recently heard Louise Penny interviewed by her publisher, and, knowing Louise now, it came as a surprise to hear her say she identified with Agent Yvette Nichol. However, here’s the final paragraph in the Acknowledgements in Still Life. “I went through a period in my life when I had no friends, when the phone never rang, when I thought I would die from loneliness. I know that the real blessing here isn’t that I have a book published, but that I have so many people to thank.” I never knew that lonely Louise. She herself is an example of the duality she writes about. I see her much more as Clara Morrow, and, she has said that as well. (Doesn’t an author put herself into many characters?) Clara is a kind woman, who really wants to belong. I only know that Louise Penny, the warm, kind woman who reaches out to others.
I first read Still Life in 2006, and met Louise in 2008 at The Poisoned Pen Bookstore in Scottsdale, Arizona. I saw a woman who reached out to every member of the small audience. I’ve repeated this story often. There was one teen in the audience, dragged there by her mother. She had headphones on. Louise started by asking her age, and when she was told thirteen, she asked if she’d read Rick Riordan’s mythological series, Percy Jackson and the Olympians. That teen was at every subsequent appearance I attended at The Poisoned Pen.
I know the Louise Penny who loves gummi bears. (Did you catch those references in Still Life?) I know the friend who always found time to squeeze in a short visit when she was in town, and I found how she listened with her heart. I know the Louise Penny who wrote me after my husband died. “I am devastated for you, as is Michael. . . . Oh, Lesa . . . our hearts break for you. How are you? Would you like to come up? Spend quiet time away and we could look after you? . . . When you feel like it please write and tell us how you are. Michael sends his love and grief, as do I. Actually, we don’t send our grief—you probably have way too much of that already. We send light. And peace.”
I know the Louise Penny of light and peace.
I know the Louise Penny who created Three Pines. She may have needed it as a refuge at one time. Fortunately for all of us, she created a place that can only be found by people who are lost. Three Pines has sheltered many lost souls.
So, welcome to Three Pines and Still Life.
RECAP
Chapters 1-6: Welcome to a small village not far from Quebec, Three Pines. It’s fall in an idyllic village with a used bookstore, a bistro with wonderful homemade food, a bakery, a Bed and Breakfast, and a general store. It’s also the village where the Chief Inspector of Homicide for the Sûreté du Quebec, Armand Gamache, is called when Miss Jane Neal is found dead.
Before we meet anyone else, readers meet the victim, Jane Neal, and the investigator, Armand Gamache. We learn a little about each in just a couple paragraphs. Jane was unmarried, seventy-six, and her death was not natural. She was kind and gentle. Gamache is in his mid-fifties, “at the height of a long and now apparently stalled career”, and, even though he was head of homicide, he was always surprised by violent death, hoping it was wrong.
Still Life is more than a murder mystery. Penny has said her books are not really about murder, but what murder dislodges in a community. And, the first half of this book introduces the community. We meet Clara Morrow and her husband Peter. They are both artists, but Peter is a success, while Clara is unknown in the art world. We learn that beyond marijuana, Three Pines had no crime. “No break-ins, no vandalism, no assaults. There weren’t even any police in Three Pines.” So, Jane’s report of an unspeakable action perpetrated by some boys came as a shock. She recognized the boys under their masks, and called out their names.
The Friday before Thanksgiving, we meet a small group of friends at a dinner at the Morrow home. Ruth Zardo is swigging Scotch. Olivier Brulé and Gabri Dubeau are the two gay men who own the Bistro, victims of the hate crime witnessed by Jane Neal. Myrna Landers, “huge, effusive, and unexpected”, is the owner of the bookstore, Ben Hadley is Peter’s best friend. Jane is celebrating the acceptance of her picture, Fair Day, for the local exhibition. When she tells them the picture was painted at the closing parade of the county fair, they all remember it was the day Peter and Clara had to tell Ben his mother, Timmer, had died while he was in Ottawa. Despite that sad recollection, Jane invites them to have drinks at her house after the opening of the exhibition.
It’s into this village that Armand Gamache brings his team. Yvette Nichol is a young agent, on her first case, desperate to make a good impression. Inspector Jean Guy Beauvoir has been Gamache’s second-in-command for more than a decade, a man who hears Gamache’s command, “Tell me what you know”, as the beginning of the hunt. Isabelle Lacoste is the agent who, walking to the site where Jane Neal died, promises her Chief Inspector Gamache would find out who killed her.
These two groups of people are brought together under the watchful eye of Armand Gamache. It’s important to know all of these characters, people who continue to show up in the series. It’s most important to see Gamache, and recognize his style of investigation.. “I watch. I’m very good at observing. Noticing things. And listening. Actively listening to what people are saying, their choice of words, their tone. What they aren’t saying.”
It doesn’t take the team long to discover that Jane Neal was killed, shot by an arrow. In a meeting of the villagers, Peter, Ben, and Matthew Croft reveal how many of them are familiar with bows and arrows, how many of them hunt, and that Jane Neal was known to confront those who were doing wrong, from Croft, who was caught hunting illegally, to the three boys who attacked Gabri and Olivier. But, Jane Neal’s death still bothers Gamache. “And that’s the puzzle, thought Gamache. Why? Why an arrow and not a bullet?…An old-fashioned wooden arrow with real feathers used to kill an elderly retired schoolteacher. Why?”
The investigation immediately swings toward looking for someone who shot that arrow, even while Gamache is interested in other aspects of Jane Neal’s life. Who inherits her estate? Naturally, the heirs are always suspect. And, Jane’s niece, Yolande, is an angry, hard woman. Who else might have reasons to wish her dead? Her painting, Fair Day, had just been accepted for Arts Williamsburg, because it was brilliant. Were other artists jealous? Clara pointed out that only a small group of friends knew the painting had been accepted, and they were all close enough for Jane to invite them to her house. So, who had the bows and arrows, the ability to kill Jane Neal?
The investigation leads to the Croft family. Matthew Croft, who hunted illegally, was once caught by Jane Neal. The police find Matthew’s wife, Suzanne, trying to hide something from them in the basement. And, then, there’s fourteen-year-old Philippe, one of the boys Jane caught attacking Olivier and Gabri. While the police wait for the results of lab tests, suspecting they found the home of the killer, Gamache decides to try out other theories. He doesn’t like to close a case too early. “Just to be on the safe side.”
Chapters 7-End: While Chief Inspector Gamache’s team waits for the results of lab tests, he turns to the bookstore, and Myrna, for inspiration and answers. While they talk, he asks about the other woman who died recently, Timmer Hadley, and he realizes Myrna knows more than she’s saying. So, he comes away from that conversation with more questions, and a book that forces him to search for answers in a place that makes him confront another fear. He has to climb to the hunting blind, and he’s afraid of heights. But, it’s there he has a conversation with Clara that opens her eyes that someone local is a killer, and their feelings have been festering.
As Gamache waits, he learns more about the villagers. Ruth Zardo is one of Canada’s most famous poets. And, Clara and the villagers have a different view of the deceased Timmer Hadley than Myrna did. They’ve known Timmer longer, as Ben’s mother, a hateful woman who terrorized her son.
And, as the villagers wait, they once again gather at Clara and Peter’s where they deconstruct the crime, and realizing one of them is a killer, they know someone killed Jane Neal on purpose. Readers who want to continue the series should watch the scenes in which the villagers gather because there are glimpses of their true characters in these moments.
When the lab results come in, the team once again visit the Crofts, where Philippe turns on his father, but Matthew Croft’s confession isn’t enough to convince Gamache of his guilt, and he refuses to arrest him, going against orders. Gamache is suspended, and Beauvoir is forced to take his gun and badge from him.
It’s while attending Jane Neal’s memorial service and reception that Gamache realizes one of his officers lied to him, and didn’t check on Jane Neal’s will. And, when the women of the village hold a prayer ritual, they discover another piece of evidence, an arrow that was still in a tree. That piece of evidence exonerates Matthew Croft, proves Jane Neal really was murdered, and it wasn’t an accident, and brings about the reinstatement of Gamache as officer in charge of the investigation.
And, it was the will, leaving everything to Clara, that opens Jane Neal’s house to the police. They find horrific wallpaper and paint in the house, but, when they look beneath it, they discover Jane Neal’s gift to the community. Her paintings on her walls reveal the history of Three Pines. And, Gamache knows that the murderer was someone on those walls as well.
But, it’s Clara, the artist, who is the first to realize who the killer is. And, her attempt to confront the killer leads to a horrifying scene, and a rescue attempt during a hurricane. The discovery of the murderer would change the villagers forever.
Louise Penny, a master storyteller, foreshadows so many of the relationships and actions in future books when she talks about her characters. Remember the characters, their reactions, their feelings, as you read future books. And, remember Three Pines. “And the pall of grief that settled on this little community was worn with dignity and sadness and a certain familiarity. This village was old, and you don’t get to be old without knowing grief. And loss.”
But, also remember Armand Gamache’s last view of Three Pines. “He looked down at the village and his heart soared. He looked over the rooftops and imagined the good, kind, flawed people inside struggling with their lives….Life was far from harried here. But neither was it still.”
FAVORITE QUOTES:
Ruth Zardo quotes poet W.H. Auden. “Evil is unspectacular and always human, and shares our bed and eats at our own table.”
Matthew 10:36. “And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.”
CONCLUSION:
As we read the other books in this series, it’s important to remember what we’ve learned about the characters. Keep in mind what you’ve learned about Gamache, Beauvoir, and Nichol, as well as about the villagers themselves; Clara, Peter, Olivier, Gabri, Ruth and Myrna. And, remember what Louise Penny said. Her books are not really about murder, but what murder dislodges in a community.
In a 2007 interview with author G.M. Malliet, Louise Penny said, “I think of Three Pines as a state of mind. A village occupied by people who have made conscious choices in their lives. Not because they’ve never been hurt, not because they’re too protected, or foolish, or shallow to know that the world can be a dreadful place. No. It’s for that very reason they’ve all made their choices. They’ve all been hurt. As have we all. But when wounded some people become embittered, cynical, sarcastic. They hurt back. But some, and I sometimes think they’re the ones most wounded, make another choice. They know nothing good comes of giving in to our darker instincts. And so they turn to what Lincoln in his Second Inaugural Address called, ‘The better angels of our nature.’ Three Pines is a place where kindness trumps cruelty, where people help each other, and care. Where sharing isn’t a word to be laughed at and even an embittered old poet is welcomed.”
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:
- Louise Penny has said she modeled Armand Gamache on her husband. How do you picture Gamache?
- Other than Armand Gamache, who is your favorite character in the first half of the book? Why?
- People in this book have secrets, even Gamache. What secrets surprised you?
- What is your reaction to Agent Nichol’s behavior?
- Is it a flaw in Gamache that he has a desire to help people, and that he’s too compassionate?
- Ben Hadley tells Gamache the story of the three pines. Do you think the trees and village still serve a similar purpose for those who seek refuge?
- What happened to the Three Pines community as a result of Jane Neal’s death?
- Gamache has a fear of heights, and shows unexpected anger. He also refuses a direct order. Do these flaws make him more human, or indicate weakness?
- What did Clara mean by having “Surprised by Joy” engraved on Jane Neal’s tombstone?
- Louise Penny says this book is about choice. What did she mean by that?
- Three Pines is Louise Penny’s ideal village. What is your ideal village like?
- Penny uses poetry throughout the book. Is there one poem or line that resonates with you?
739 replies on “Series Re-Read: Still Life”
So glad I found this. I have read and re-read all the books. The discussion was very interesting. Will look forward to many more.
Way too late, I assume, but the Three Pines series has fairly recently appeared on Amazon Prime and there are mixed reviews. They made me watch the 2013 adaptation of Still Life, which I don’t love, but actually I ended up liking quite a bit! It’s more strictly faithful to the book than the Three Pines series is.
I don’t love Nathaniel Parker as Gamache, though if I don’t think of him as Gamache, have to say I love his meeting with Ruth and his quoting of “Who hurt you once…”
Jean-Guy is not my favorite, either, but brash, good-looking, and smart, meets the description of his character. Nichol and Lacoste and Harris – whatever.
What I love is, surprisingly, Clara, and how the village thinks of Jane. Easily the most likeable person in Three Pines, at least to me, this actress being extremely attractive and less middle-aged pate-smeared-in-her-hair than book Clara, shows all the warmth and heart the “real” Clara has. Adored the “What do you do with a drunken sailor?” service.
Wish they’d kept this Clara, an emotional anchor of Three Pines, for the “Three Pines” series Amazon Prime put out, rather than the insipid character she ended up being. (Not to mention her whiny husband Peter, miscast in both but at least being closer in character in Still Live adaptation.)
[…] read the first book in the series, we invite you to refresh your memory of the novel with our Re-Read lead by Lesa Holstine. You can also learn more about the real-life inspirations behind the settings […]
[…] it quite a bit, and I’m on hold for the next in the series. I’m intrigued by Penny saying “Just as I created a community I would live in in Three Pines, and villagers I would choose […]
Located in the Equitable Building in Manhattan, Minotaur Books publishes bestselling and award-winning crime fiction ranging from thrillers and suspense to traditional mysteries. Minotaur has published Louise Penny since 2007.
Hello, I realize that this discussion is quite old, but I’m hoping someone will see this and provide an answer to something which is driving me crazy. In chapter 9, lab results come back to show that Jane Neal’s blood was on the bow found in the Croft’s basement, as well as some of Phillipe’s clothing. Was there ever an explanation given for why these items would be contain her blood if Ben was the murderer? Louise Penny seems like such a careful writer that I can’t believe that this huge plot hole would be left unaddressed, but I’ve looked back over the book and can’t find anything to explain it. Thank you for any passages you can point me to.
Never mind, I found it ♀️
Philippe comes across the already dead body, and because he’s just shot an arrow in that direction, thinks he killed her. He takes the arrow, getting blood on his bow, clothes and bike.
Because the Croft boy thought the arrow was the one he shot (later found in a tree) and took it home
What was it about Fair Day that touched Clara so deeply?
Jane left her house to Clara. Did she and Peter move into it? Not say in next book(s).
Did Jane suspect Ben of murdering Timmer?
[…] them a cranky poet with a pet duck and a penchant for four-letter words. At their moral center is Chief Inspector Armand Gamache of the Sûreté du Québec, the provincial police force, who excavates the dark secrets […]
In preparing for book club, I am reading critiques by readers and find them very helpful–not only reminding me of details I had rushed over but also getting me to look at my own life and see somethings I haven’t been able to voice. I realize I have lived a Still Life–even as a child I dreamed of some particular boy –even one I had seen from a distance and didn’t know– to approach me and like me. I dreamed always of what I didn’t have and believed if I just had this or him, I would be happy. As a widow, I wait for some guy who fits my list to save me from loneliness.
The discussion of Life is Loss also forced me to look at myself from a different perspective. True, we lose our innocence, we lose our best friend, we lose our parents, some lose a job, we lose our spouse–and mine died 10 years ago. During that time I have been filled with guilt, thinking of how I should have been more loving and supportive. How I should have done the same with my children. I have been living a very still life. Myrna says we have to find a higher meaning to our lives than these things (the losses, the guilt). I need to let go. I think Ruth says that maybe she didn’t want to get rid of her guilt….she preferred living in her particular hell.
These ideas resonate with me and wake me up. I don’t want to live a still life anymore.
Carole, your life and mine have similar parallels. After a personal tragedy I found myself living a, “Still Life.” After reading the book I realized Louise Penny’s characters were deeply flawed yet perfect in their imperfections. So, I mused, if Ms. Penny can create flawed characters that we, the readers, are able to love and care about deeply then I can reinvent myself, flaws and all, into someone worthy of the friendship, love, respect of other flawed people. People just like me. The catch was how to do that? Books find their way into people’s hands and hearts because of a review, excerpt or some sort of “social” event.
Long story, short….I began a journey of caring. First I lavished compassionate self care on myself. Changed my hairstyle. Updated my very dated wardrobe. Brought myself into 2021 with hope in my heart and a smile on my face. And forgiveness. If I could forgive myself everything else would fall into place. Here it is, June 2023. I’m a death coach, a yoga teacher and an energy healer. I am loved. I have people that care about me and I care about them. It all began with with a stranger on a bench in a local park. She was quite sad (weeping softly). I very quietly sat down beside her and asked how I could help. The rest is history. If we want to find life we must reach beyond what we see, what we know to be safe. Reach into the darkness to lead and be led into the light.
May light and love always be your companions
Cheryl, your story is beautiful. Thank you.
saw the Still Life movie – questions apparently unanswered when movie ended:
1) Why did Ben kill his mother, who was dying anyway?
2) Who killed Jane and why?
If anyone can answer these questions, please help. Thanks
Just watched the TV version of “still life.” It’s been a while since I read the book. Does anyone know, why did Ben Hadley kill his mother who was dying anyway?
He killed her because she was planning to change her will to leave him only enough to get by, in order to force him to take charge of his life.
I love this series and eagerly anticipate each book. I recently finished The Long Way Home, and was talking to someone about the series and recommending it…which led me to reread Still Life.
I am very confused by something…maybe someone here can help clear this up for me.
In the part of the book where Gamache is talking to Yolande, about Jane’s death (chapter 3; page 77 in my Kindle edition) it reads “Gamache had seen enough grief in his time to know people handle it in different ways. His own mother, upon waking up next to her husband of 50 years dead in the bed, called her hairdresser first to cancel her appointment.”
BUT we learn in later books that Gamache’s parents were killed in an auto accident when he was a child.
Has this anomaly been addressed before? Or corrected?
It is his aunt not his mother.
I’m listening to Still Life again. The sentence starts “His own mother, upon waking up next to her husband of 50 years….” What a curious anomaly since the story of his parents’ accident comes up repeatedly through the series.
Yes, it definitely says his own mother and he was raised by his grandmother, Zora
I was listening to the book and went back twice to be sure it said “his own mother.” Then I got the Kindle version to look it up and that says “his aunt.”
Yes, in the first editions it said his mother. But Louise had a change of plans. Later editions of the printed and kindle versions have been changed to his aunt. But, the audio was never changed.
I’m re-reading the books now and am finding a few anomalies, though I think this is the biggest. It’s kind of fun to find these and other bread crumbs she left. 🙂
Such interesting insights! I’m 53 and I think I would have loved this series as a younger adult. The characters are all so complexly human and well developed (including characters such as the village, the bistro, the bookstore…). The series is wonderfully real to life in that, although the mystery of each book is solved within the pages of the book, the stories of the characters lives are not neatly wrapped up within 200 pages. Their lives continue to develop and spill over. I love most of the characters. Gamache is who I would idealistically want as my father, husband, brother… I mourn that I will not get to know Jane and Timmer. And that I will never actually get to see Jane’s paintings. I’ve read other books in which character’s paintings have featured but never have they been so real and moving to me. My favorite character is Jean Guy. He is young and immature so has a lot of growing to do. He is rigid only in an attempt to control his fear of the love that is within him. His relationship with Gamache is a special thing to read about. I am impressed with how many of you are able to appreciate Nichol. I can appreciate her as a foil and source of conflict but I just can’t bring myself to like her-yet. I am also somewhat confused by her relationship with her father. I’ve always enjoyed Lacoste and would love to see her featured more. Peter is shallow and easy to dislike but I wonder if we will get to know him better in the Long Way Home. It is hard to keep comments to just Still Life when I have reread the series so many times, getting more out of the books with each reread. Thanks to you all for your thoughts. Your thoughts give me more to think about!
Let me say that I did not have time to join the discussion. However, I did reread the book and enjoyed it even more the second time around! However, my family does not understand why I go around the house singing, What Do You Do With A Drunken Sailor.
.I marvel at Penny’s way with words and development of characters. Love the section where Gamache is having a discussion with Nicole about choices and observations. A quote: “We choose our thoughts. We choose our perceptions. We choose our attitudes. We may not think so. We may not believe it, bt we do.” Such wisdom.
And then Myrna:”the fault lies with us, and only us.”
So not only do we have a delicious murder to solve, but we have such searching of souls.
Thank you Lesa for the great discussion! I’ve enjoyed reading all the comments!
No need to re-register. Here’s the link to the discussion of A FATAL GRACE:
http://gamacheseries.wpengine.com/a-fatal-grace-part-1/
Let’s give a huge round of applause for Lesa Holstine!!!
Okay, Mr. Tech Supreme!
* – Do we have to re-register to continue on with the next book some where?
* – Kudos to you for paginations and helping to make site more accessible to readers & responders. This one really appreciates your efforts to make this more user friendly. Sending you 3 gold stars for your forehead! – Meg
Question: what did Agent Lacoste find on the back of the poster in Bernard’s room?
One can infer that Lacoste found a gay equilvatent of Playboy magazine that nasty Bernard had taken from Phillipe Croft and was keeping to blackmail Phillipe.